Geek Out!

live.pirillo.com

More Information

Under growing criticism from the public and its own shareholders, GE announced in 2005 that it would accept no new business in Iran and would wind down existing contracts, which mostly involved
sales of oil, gas and energy and health-care equipment. The remaining
work, valued at less than $50 million, amounts to less than .01 percent
of GE's income, and the company says the final four contracts will
expire within weeks.
Timeline: For a period of time prior to 2005, GE stockholders were protesting the company's trade with Iran.
2005: GE announces it will stop doing business with Iran. 2008: GE is
still doing business with Iran, albeit at a lower level.

Here's another timeline. Date this one 1987:
In an effort to further isolate Iran, the Reagan Administration is moving toward more severe restrictions on trade with that country, State
Department officials said today.

The impending crackdown was described as a reflection of the heightened tensions between the United
States and Iran over the Persian Gulf. (NYT)
This news item wasn't really news, since Iran was already a State Sponsor of Terrorism. Here's State's position:
Countries determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism are designated pursuant to
three laws: section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, section 40
of the Arms Export Control Act, and section 620A of the Foreign
Assistance Act. Taken together, the four main categories of sanctions
resulting from designation under these authorities include restrictions
on U.S. foreign assistance; a ban on defense exports and sales; certain
controls over exports of dual use items; and miscellaneous financial
and other restrictions.

Designation under the above-referenced authorities also implicates other sanctions laws that penalize persons
and countries engaging in certain trade with state sponsors. Currently
there are five countries designated under these authorities: Cuba,
Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria.
Iran was named a State Sponsor of Terrorism on January 19, 1984 -- 21 years before GE
shareholders pressured the American company to follow American laws,
even in its European operations. GE was clearly aware that its sales to
Iran would violate this law if they were made by American operations,
so it purposefully did business with Iran through its European
operations.

GE's excuse flunks. We expect American global enterprises to be American first and global second -- especially on
issues like this.
I think this is just a load of bull crap, if GE was going to stop trade with iran and various other embargoed companies than they would have the moment that the state department put the embargo up. not 5 years later.
Sheffer's denial is complete. Nothing now, nothing ever, supplied by GE has in any way endangered US troops. Additionally, Immelt had a
statement issued last month that said sales of hospital equipment are
allowed under a humanitarian program licensed by the U.S. government.

Earlier -- in 2005 -- Sheffer had this to say about GE sales to Iran:
"Senior management and the board decided in mid-December to discontinue taking new orders because of uncertain conditions relating to Iran."
"Uncertain conditions" was disingenuous, since the reason for the cut-off was
quite a certain condition: Shareholders were rebelling, casting a
spotlight on sales GE would just as soon keep quiet.

And what of the non-medical sales? The energy and gas production equipment?

GE can hide behind humanitarianism in their hospital equipment sales (and
I'm sure the equipment is sold at a strictly humanitarian price point),
but no such cover is provided for energy production equipment. What
were our primary targets in our air bombing campaign against Germany in
WWII? Military installations, factories and oil refineries and storage
facilities.

None of the weapons Iran manufactures for use against us in Iraq can be manufactured without energy. None can be
transported to Iraq without energy. And for that reason, Sheffer's
blanket excuse is a moth-eaten heap of holes.

Views: 9

Comment

You need to be a member of Geeks to add comments!

Join Geeks

Comment by Steve Gaichin on April 24, 2010 at 2:02pm
Hey poobar, where did you hear about ford helping out the Germans during WW II . I have heard about the IBM thing , but not about ford. I would like to learn more about ford's actions!
Comment by james tilton on April 22, 2010 at 4:48pm
It just shows that with money you can do antyhing you want and have no consequences. If you rape someone just hire lwayers to drag your victims name through the mud until they withdraw the accusations, if you murder someone line the pockets of the judge, if you commet treasom line the pockets of the politicians.Because the bottom line is greed and the lust of money is the true power running things.
Comment by Phoobar on April 22, 2010 at 5:08am
GE isn't the only company who has a history of going against the laws of this country. The two most graphic examples are IBM & Ford during WWII. IBM supplied the tabulation equipment for Nazi Germany before & during the war. Ford was building war machines for the Nazi's before & during the war.

The government evens gets into the act. Remember the Iran Contra debacle during the second Reagan administration. Just because someone has misguided beliefs & uses the best lawyers/judges you can find doesn't make it right. The ends never justifies the means. If it does...why have morals/ethics in the first place?

© 2012   Created by Chris Pirillo.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service